Since today’s topic is obedience, I am going to begin by giving you a command:
“Thou shalt post comments”
According to Mormon doctrine, obedience is the “First Law of Heaven.” There is also the “First Principle of the Gospel,” which Mormon-savvy readers will identify as faith. These are two important firsts in the teachings of Mormonism, and this is no coincidence. I believe the two words – “faith” and “obedience” – for the most part are one-in-the-same. But we’ll get to that in a minute.
While we’re on words, let’s look at the word “obedience” a bit closer. I admit, for most of my life, the word “obedience” sounded like nails on a blackboard to my ears. I don’t think that I am the only one for whom that is the case either. This definition of obedience meant being compelled to do something that I would otherwise have no interest in doing.
Since Mormons emphasize obedience so much, it is easy to understand why critics claim that Mormons are a bunch of “sheep,” being compelled to live according to a relatively strict moral code. In this definition of the word, obedience is blind.
This is how I thought for most of my life, including during my first few years as an active Mormon. Of course, there are many church members who are seemingly bound by laws that they would otherwise be inclined to break. I have heard many Mormons claim: “it’s a good thing I’m a Mormon, because if I wasn’t, there’s no telling all the bad things I would be doing!”
However, upon closer examination, I noticed that a significant portion of Mormons did not share this same sentiment. Sure, they were obedient to the commandments. But there was a fundamental difference – they did so willingly, and without any complaint or without seeming to have desires to do anything but be obedient. I began to realize that this was a different kind of obedience, which was nothing like the blind or compelled obedience that I thought made up the very definition of the word.
According to this second definition, a synonym for obedience could be “loyalty,” which still tends to carry a more positive connotation amongst Anglophones. Church members who willingly obey do so because the desires of their heart are to act in accordance with the will of God. This doesn’t mean that they do everything without question. In fact, Mormons are encouraged to seek greater understanding through prayer, study, discussion, and deep-thinking or pondering.
Now, this is where “obedience” and “faith” become the same thing to me, in terms of how they are properly defined in the language of Mormonism. Faith is acting upon a partial knowledge and understanding. As we exercise faith in something (religious or not) our understanding pertaining to that thing increases. In other words, if we obey some law, we gain understanding of whether continued obedience to that law is worth it. Therefore, faith/obedience is defined as the action we take.
When I have used this principle, it has never failed to prove successful for me. Not every law I have obeyed has been a good one. I have certainly exercised faith in things that didn’t merit my faith, but in most cases, I have thankfully gained understanding from these experiences. However, I have yet to identify any law from God, as set forth in the Gospel, to which obedience hasn’t resulted in a greater knowledge that what I have done is right.
In conclusion, obedience can be a very good thing. It is not something that is meant to be done blindly. It should be done with full consciousness and willingness, according to our agency. So, I guess that means you only have to leave comments if you really want to.
P.S. I watched Star Wars Episode III last night, and as I was about to fall asleep, I thought of an absolutely awful Star Wars/Obedience joke, which I will share with you now:
What was Anakin Skywalker required to recite over and over again to his Master during his Jedi obedience training?
Master – Obey, One Can Obey
I warned you it was bad.
DISCLAIMER:
The content expressed on this blog reflects the opinion of the author, and does not represent the opinions of any organization with which the author may be affiliated, including the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


5 comments:
Not really sure what I can say in regards to your post Nils, it was informative, but chatty not so sure, so here goes where my mind went upon reading it, I am a female so alas it floats about rather rapidly.
I remember thinking in my 20's what type of learner am I. I decided that experiencing things for myself was the best teacher for me, not always the brightest way of learning, but alas effective and it's allowed me to get along with a wide variety of people through the years.
There is that saying that goes "the smart people learn from others mistakes, instead of doing them themselves". I would say I've done some of that but it's certainly leaning more towards the learn for myself I think.
I have a good friend that I grew up with, she's always been so obedient and never seen any ounce of controversy in her about Mormonism and it's teachings or in her thinking out of the square. Her life has gone by very smoothly and no real drama's have ever come her way. To some that may appear great, but for me I think wow how boring! She has mentioned to me that she feels she's never really done anything exciting, and I can't say I don't agree with her.
Which leads me to the question, is being obedient and faithful all the time, make you a boring person?
I'm starting to think that is the case.
What do others think?
Roly, you sound like a really hot babe. Wanna make out?
I think being boring is a factor of one's personality, regardless of what religion or moral stance one takes.
I think people that get stuff done inevitably make mistakes, some mistakes because they didn't know better, some mistakes because they're trying to bend the rules a little to get what they're after, and some mistakes because the rules just don't make enough sense.
This discussion reminds me of an episode of Star Trek (for those of you who are allergic to scifi, pretend I said Seinfeld) where Captain Picard is given a chance to go back in time and change the course of events. When he was younger, there was a fight that broke out and he got stabbed through the heart, and now he's back on the operating table 20 years later, close to death. He goes back in time and prevents the quarrel successfully. Fast forward 20 years and he's a lowly Ensign on the Enterprise, and Cdr Riker is confused as to why this low level officer is even talking to him. Riker describes Picard as... punctual.
The boring Picard was following the rules. The Picard that is commanding his own ship was not.
I think what this post is trying to get at is that some people follow the rules to the letter and not question, and some people follow as many rules as they can, but when faced with a situation, they have to decide whether breaking the rules/law/commandments is really so bad. Sometimes yes, and I guess sometimes no.
History isn't written by people who followed the rules.
Does this mean that rules/laws/commandments are worthless? No.. I think that we still need to have some rubric by which to live, it's just that in human nature is the tendency to deviate from time to time. I think human nature makes the rubric even more important, in order to navigate one's way back after a disaster.
Though I have read this blog occasionally, this is my first time commenting (btw- Elder Steven Lambson- aka Lammy, apparently- happens to be my little bro :)
A line from an old-ish seminary video has stuck with me for many years when talking about agency, choice, and obedience:
"Laws designate which choices are right and which choices are wrong."
I am also reminded of a scene from one of my favorite movies, Chariots of Fire- in talking about God's law, one man points out that there is one law, one right way of doing things, one absolute ruler (i.e. God). Another man responds, "A dictator, you mean?" To which the first replies, "Aye, but a benign, benevolent dictator..." The second man says, "So much for your freedom of choice." Then Eric, one of the main characters points out to him, "You still have choice, Sandy. Nobody is forcing you."
ONe of my favorite hymns (#240 in the LDS hymnal), written by the ever-wise Anonymous, explains how every soul is free choose- that, as much as God will try to guide us into paths of truth and happiness, He will never force us to obey.
So, with all that said, back to the obedience factor- God has not given us commandments to take away our fun. He has not given us commandments to make us boring people. I like to think of myself as reasonably obedient, but I also consider myself to be a pretty funny, crazy, dynamic person. There are different ways of defining what "living" actually means. The way the world defines it, I'm okay without all the drama, the pain, the frustration and ultimate misery of one kind or another that that kind of "living" brings. Obedience to God's commandments does not guarantee an easy life, but it does promise light, truth, even peace- peace of mind, peace of heart, peace of soul. Sometimes these blessings are quickly evident. Sometimes they may not be found until the next life. That is where the faith comes in. But everything He asks us to do is to prepare us for an eternity of joy, of happiness, of excitement and growth and learning and the most amazing work imaginable--things we will not understand or be able to enjoy if we don't learn a little self-restraint, a little unconditional compassion, a little brotherly love and kindness now, in this world, in this life.
(okay, sorry for the epic entry, but if you remember my brother at all, you probably should not be surprised...)
I've been thinking about obedience lately. I'm a naturally curious person. I like to know why I'm being asked to do something. For example, I hated going around saying I followed the Word of Wisdom when I didn't even know what it was really saying. Once I studied it, read some articles about it, and really meditated about it, I felt confidant that I was doing the right thing by following it. But that didn't come until I had studied until I felt like I really understood the doctrine and how not obeying it could affect me.
I think the same thing goes for other commandments. We are intelligent people. We are supposed to act and question and pray for truth. Finding out for ourselves makes us stronger personally, but also a stronger and more effective servant of the Lord.
I don't want to be a person who obeys without being able to explain to someone, with fervor, why I do what I do and believe what I believe. Of course, there are some doctrines that I still don't understand or feel fully comfortable with. My husband says that we should obey just in case. lol But there are promises in the scriptures about that - that through obedience and pondering we can come to a greater knowledge. That's a lot to look forward to.
Roly-
Good question. I agree that some who seem to be extremely obedient seem to have little excitement in their lives. For me, I suppose it would depend on the manner of obedience. Some do so as a natural part of who they are. Others obey with a more strict "by-the-book" approach. And I guess I have a question through which you might perhaps clarify yours a bit. Is there only one way to obey? Do you think obedience absolutely equals boringness?
Tobyo-
Stop hitting on my commenters. Then again, Roly does sound like a good match for you, so maybe you two should consider meeting up. I can imagine you would have at least three nice children (especially the girl in the middle with red hair, hypothetically).
First of all, that is one of my favorite Star Trek episodes. Great analogy.
Second of all, does making mistakes ultimately mean that we are breaking the rules? Making mistakes that we have made countless times before may be bad, but if we are new to some rule and break it without even really knowing we were breaking it, are we still being obedient, just a form of mortal obedience?
I recall my time as a missionary. I consider myself to have been an "obedient missionary," though I am sure there are hundreds of instances when I technically "broke the rules." I think ultimately it depends on where our heart lies. Are we purposefully trying to rebel just for the sake of showing that we are "free," or do we judge and react to each situation contextually, which may at times means coloring outside the lines?
Peeser-
Great to have you commenting. Sorry I didn't get a chance to welcome you sooner. You've got a great wee brother.
You make a great case for the "depends on the context" argument. I know a lot of people don't like that answer to their questions, but I think it nearly 100% of the time is true. We have choices, but every time we make a choice, it is going to be a little different than the last time. Welcome to the world of color!
Sarah-
I like your point about the desire to understand what is being obeyed. I don't understand every commandment ever uttered by the mouth of God, but I would sure like to. I would be more afraid if somebody didn't want to know the answer if they could. In fact, generally those who don't want to understand already do, they just use it as an excuse to not have to change.
Thanks so much for your comments!
Post a Comment